It is generally believed, higher the per-capita expenditure of healthcare, better is the overall ‘healthcare performance’ of a nation.
However, this myth has recently been busted by a new study, the take-home message of which would be quite relevant for India too. It flags a very important point, just as too low per-capita expenditure on healthcare fails to deliver an optimal healthcare performance to the target population, higher health expenditure, on the other hand, does not have any linear relationship with commensurately better healthcare performance either.
The question, therefore, comes up: What then would be the optimal per-capita spending on healthcare to offer quality healthcare performance in a country like India?
The study:
According to this recent Commonwealth Fund report , per-capita expenditures on healthcare in 2011 of eleven wealthy nations were as follows:
Per-Capita Healthcare Spend in 2011
Rank | Country | US $ |
1. | United States | 8,508 |
2. | Norway | 5,669 |
3. | Switzerland | 5,643 |
4. | Netherlands | 5,099 |
5. | Canada | 4,522 |
6. | Germany | 4,495 |
7. | France | 4,111 |
8. | Sweden | 3,925 |
9. | Australia | 3,800 |
10. | United Kingdom | 3,405 |
11. | New Zealand | 3,182 |
Against the above spend, the ‘Healthcare Performance’ rankings of the same 11 nations were as under, showing no linear relationship between higher per-capita healthcare expenditure and better healthcare performance:
Performance of Healthcare System
Rank | Country |
1. | United Kingdom |
2. | Switzerland |
3. | Sweden |
4. | Australia |
5. | Germany |
6. | Netherlands |
7. | New Zealand |
8. | Norway |
9. | France |
10. | Canada |
11. | United States |
The basis of ranking:
Interestingly, though the healthcare expenditure of the United States of America at 17.4 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the highest in the world, according to thisreport, America ranks worst among all these nations, namely, France, Australia, Germany, Canada, Sweden, New Zealand, Norway, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
The ranking was made based various factors, which include quality of care, access to doctors and equity throughout the country.
The U.K. ranked best, with Switzerland following a close second, though their respective per-capita expenditures on healthcare were much less than the United States.
Holds good in BRIC perspective too:
Coming to the BRIC nations’ perspective, though India’s per-capita healthcare spend has been the lowest among these 4 countries, the following quick example would clearly establish that here also the healthcare performance does not have any linear relationship with the per-capita healthcare spend:
Per capita Healthcare expenditure in 2011: Country Comparison
Country | US $ | World Rank | Physician/1000 people | Hospital/1000 people | Life expectancy at birth (years) |
Brazil | 1120.56 | 41 | 1.76 | 2.3 | 73.4 |
Russia | 806.7 | 55 | 4.31 | 9.6 | 69.0 |
India | 59.1 | 152 | 0.65 | 0.9 | 67.08 |
China | 278.02 | 99 | 1.82 | 3.8 | 73.5 |
(Source: WHO data)
Taking the United States as an example:
To illustrate the point further, let me take the US details as an example, as it incurs the highest per-capita expenditure on healthcare. When that is the fact, does high healthcare spending of the US help the patients commensurately?
Going by these reports, it does not appear so, as:....
For more details, please click on this link
No comments:
Post a Comment